認許年份
內側欄(2015)
資格
-
- 法學士(香港大學)(1989年)
- 法學士(香港大學)(1990)
- 法學碩士(香港大學)(1996年)
- 人權法學碩士(香港大學)(2013年)
- 電腦犯罪調查與電腦鑑識培訓課程證書(科技大學)
- 電腦鑑識專業文憑(科技大學)
語言
個人檔案
Head of Chambers
大衛於1992年在香港獲授律師資格,主要專注於民事訴訟實務,涵蓋廣泛案件類型,包括人身傷害及僱員補償(同時代表原告與被告)、婚姻訴訟、物業轉易、買賣雙方傳票及馬雷瓦禁制令。 作為辯護律師,他曾出庭處理第十四號命令申請、具爭議性的管養權及贍養費訴訟、僱員補償審訊,並於裁判法院參與超過五十宗審訊。.
1995年,大衛加入當時律政司的檢控科擔任檢控官。在檢控科任職的25年間,大衛幾乎參與過檢控工作的每個環節,在刑事案件的法律諮詢及審理方面累積了廣泛經驗。他尤其擅長在各級法院進行審訊及上訴程序。 他曾主導約30宗陪審團審訊、數百宗區域法院及裁判法院案件,並處理逾500宗刑事上訴。大衛經手的案件多涉及多名被告及複雜的事實與法律爭議,其專業領域涵蓋證監會案件、商業欺詐、網絡犯罪、數碼證據、人權及憲法辯論、刑事上訴、刑期覆核及訟費申索等。.
大衛於2015年獲授御用大律師資格。2017年,他獲委任為司法部檢控署署長,領導檢控部門,並於該職位任職至2020年。.
David commenced private practice in 2022. He continues to conduct trials and appeals and advises defendants and victims of crimes.
大衛連續三年(2023、2024及2025年)獲《道爾指南:香港頂尖刑事法律大律師》評選為「推薦資深大律師」類別。
大衛多年來於香港大學教授刑事訴訟程序及辯護技巧課程。他長期擔任香港辯護培訓委員會轄下「見習辯護人培訓計劃」及「檢控官即席培訓計劃」的常駐培訓導師,並曾於倫敦、文萊、都柏林、斐濟及南非等地協助培訓辯護技巧課程。.
著名案件
HKSAR v Chu Ka Lok CACC 69/2023 (CA) (Appeal against conviction. Theft. The payment of funds into the defendant’s account for bulk purchases did not automatically give rise to a 奎斯特克洛斯 信任。 普雷迪 所採用的原則——銀行轉帳創造了屬於收款人而非付款人的新債權。
HKSAR v Li Qingbin FACC 7/2024 (CFA) (Statutory interpretation of making a false statement to an immigration officer and using a false travel instrument under the Immigration Ordinance)
HKSAR v Kho Yin Tak HCMA 109/2024 (MA) (Appeal against sentence, conspiracy to defraud, using the ID card of another person to attend an examination, whether a suspended sentence was appropriate)
HKSAR v 曾耀光 CACC 77/2022 (CA) CACC 77/2022 (CA)(針對量刑的上訴,洗錢罪,被告在不同銀行帳戶間進行資金分層或轉帳的行為,是否應在量刑時分別計算)
HKSAR v 梁偉堂 HCMA 249/2023 (MA) (Appeal against conviction and sentence, fraud, knowledge of falsity, inference to be drawn from primary evidence)
HKSAR v 葉燿鋒 HCMA 434/2022 (MA) (Appeal against sentence, cruelty to animals, CSO)
HKSAR v 張士宏 HCMA 27/2023 (MA) (Appeal against sentence, failure to pay wages on time, CSO, scope of comments of probation officer in compiling CSO report)
HKSAR v Lung Siu Chuen CACC 279/2021 (CA) (Right to a fair trial, vacant possession)
HKSAR v 黃証鴻 DCCC 188/2022 (District Court sentence) (Unlawful sexual intercourse with a girl under 16, Newton inquiry)
HKSAR v Federal Express Limited HCMA 28/2022 (MA) (The standard and burden of proof of the statutory defence under section 7(3) of the Import and Export Ordinance)
Re Mr David Perry QC HCMP 2221/2020 (CFI) (Ad Hoc Admission)
HKSAR v Ngan Wing Chau [2021] 1 HKLRD 488 (CA) (Murder appeal on the proper direction to the jury on possible alternative defence)
HKSAR v Lui Tsun Sum & others [2021] 4 HKLRD 148, 171 (CA) (The Court summarised the relevant principles regarding 無行為能力)
Secretary for Justice v Leung Kwok Hung [2020] 3 HKLRD 190 (CA) (Scope of the privileges and immunities of the Legco member under BL77 and sections 3 and 4 of the Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance. Constitutionality of the offence under s 17(c) of the LC(PP)O)
HKSAR v Leung Tin Kei & others [2020] 4 HKLRD 428, 462 (CA) (Whether common purpose is an element of the offence of riot and sentencing principles regarding riot)
HKSAR v Wong Cho Shing & others DCCC 980/2015 (District Court trial), CACC 38/2017 (CA), (2020) 23 HKCFAR 153 (Appeal Committee) (A wounding case committed by 7 police officers, test for admissibility of digital evidence)
HKSAR v Chau Yui Ming (2019) 22 HKCFAR 368 (CFA) (The Court reviewed the legal principles regarding alternative verdicts, particularly those not being lesser offences)
HKSAR v Ng Man Yuen Avery (2019) 22 HKCFAR 241 (Appeal Committee) (The Court reiterated that every party, both defence and prosecution, has the right to be heard)
HKSAR v Cheng Ka Yee & others (2019) 22 HKCFAR 97 (CFA) (Statutory interpretation of the scope of the offence of obtaining access to a computer with a view to dishonest gain under section 161(c) of the Crimes Ordinance)
HKSAR v Tai Yiu Ting & 8 others DCCC 480/2017 (Occupy Central Movement trial in the District Court)
Re Mr Jonathan Caplan QC HCMP 1262/2018 (CFI) (Ad hoc admission)
Secretary for Justice v Wong Chi Fung & others (2018) 21 HKCFAR 35 (CFA) (The Court examined to what extent the Court of Appeal can reverse, modify, substitute or supplement the factual basis of the original sentence in SJ’s application for review of sentence under section 81A of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance)
HKSAR v Wan Thomas & another [2016] 5 HKLRD 656 (CA), (2018) 21 HKCFAR 214 (CFA) (Statutory interpretation of the regime under the Prison Rules on the scope of persons visiting prisoners on remand awaiting trial)
Secretary for Justice v Wong Chi Fung & others [2018] 2 HKLRD 657, 699 (CA) (The Court laid down sentencing principles regarding the offence of unlawful assembly)
HKSAR v 莫嘉濤 & 8 others DCCC 901/2016 (Trial in the District Court of the riot which took place in 2016)
Nguyen Anh Nga v HKSAR (2017) 20 HKCFAR 149 (CFA) (Proper direction on the drawing of inferences)
Jiang Hai Pu v The Department of Justice [2016] 5 HKLRD 184, 197 (CA) (Whether a review of taxation of costs order under section 21 of the Costs in Criminal Cases Ordinance is a final and conclusive judgment)
HKSAR v Lau Shing Chung Simon (2015) 18 HKCFAR 50 (CFA) (Admissibility of records of smartphone text messages – whether it was hearsay or required to be in conformity with section 22A of the Evidence Ordinance)
HKSAR v Koo Sze Yiu & another [2014] 4 HKLRD 565, 582 (MA), (2014) 17 HKCFAR 811 (Appeal Committee) (Whether the offence of desecrating the regional flag, contrary to section 7 of the Regional Flag and Regional Emblem Ordinance, infringes the right to hold opinions without interference under Article 16(1) of the BORO, Article 19 ICCPR and is therefore inconsistent with BL39 and unconstitutional)
Secretary for Justice v Ng Siu Lun CACC 304/2013 (CA) (Proper approach in an application for discharge under s16 of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance)
HKSAR v Li Jialin DCCC 1282/2010 (District Court trial), [2014] 2 HKLRD 538 (CA) (Meaning of “price” for the purpose of the offence of price rigging contrary to section 296(1)(a) of the Securities and Futures Ordinance)
HKSAR v Wong Kwok Wai (2013) 16 HKCFAR 191 (Appeal Committee) (Test for “acting in collusion” with a money lender under section 29(10) of the Money Lenders Ordinance)
HKSAR v Leung Kwok Chi [2013] 3 HKLRD 451 (CA) (SJ’s application for review of sentence for an offence of possession of arms and ammunition without a licence)
HKSAR v Au Yeung Lai Hung Doris [2013] 3 HKLRD 576, 586 (CA) (Meaning of “unnecessary and improper” under section 17 of the Costs in Criminal Cases Ordinance)
HKSAR v Hsu Ming Mei [2013] 1 HKLRD 286 (CA) (Complicated case of theft and access to a computer with dishonest intent to cause loss to another. Identified an appeal ground/argument not raised by the applicant. Application of proviso)
HKSAR v Chan Pak Hoe Pablo HCMA 754/2010 (MA), (2012) 15 HKCFAR 244 (CFA) (一宗內幕交易案。對《裁判官條例》第104條的法定詮釋——在定罪上訴尚未審結期間,裁判官能否覆核刑罰)
HKSAR v Fu Kor Kuen Patrick & another CACC 179/2010 (CA), (2012) 15 HKCFAR 524 (CFA), led by Mr Kevin Zervos SC (A case of false trading. Statutory interpretation and the burden of proof of the defence under section 295(5) and (7) of the Securities and Futures Ordinance)
HKSAR v Muhammad Riaz Khan CACC 125/2003 (CA), (2012) 15 HKCFAR 232 (CFA), led by Mr Kevin Zervos SC (Test for admissibility of evidence obtained in breach of the defendant’s fundamental rights under the Basic Law or the Bill of Rights)
HKSAR v Chan Kim Chung Nelson [2012] 2 HKLRD 263 (CA) (Principles of sentencing a predicate offence and a connected offence of money laundering)
Secretary for Justice v William Ng Esq. A Coroner [2011] 1 HKLRD 283 (CFI) (Proper approach in an application under section 20 of the Coroners Ordinance for a death inquest to be held)
教育背景與資格
-
- 法學士(香港大學)(1989年)
- 法學士(香港大學)(1990)
- 法學碩士(香港大學)(1996年)
- 人權法學碩士(香港大學)(2013年)
- 電腦犯罪調查與電腦鑑識培訓課程證書(科技大學)
- 電腦鑑識專業文憑(科技大學)
任命、成就與獎項
- 香港大學法律學院專業法律教育系榮譽講師(2000年-2021年)
- 香港法律改革委員會雙重危險小組委員會委員(2006年至2011年)
- 司法研究委員會成員(2010年至2012年)
- 香港大學法律學院專業法律教育系兼任教授(2015–2021)
- 香港倡導培訓委員會執行委員會成員(2023年至今)
出版物
- 香港法例註釋版《刑事訴訟訟費條例》,第492章(1997年及2007年)
- 《香港阿奇博爾德法典》2004年版 撰稿作者
- 《電子證據:披露、取證與可採性》第二版(2010年)LexisNexis Butterworths出版社香港篇章撰稿人
- 香港《律師豁免權、專業操守與風險管理》章節撰稿人(2007年)Sweet & Maxwell Asia
- 《電子證據:披露、取證與可採性》第二版(2010年)LexisNexis Butterworths出版社香港篇章撰稿人

