执业年份

香港(1998年)
内侧杆(2015)
    • 法学学士(香港大学)(1989年)
    • 法学学士(香港大学)(1990)
    • 香港大学法学硕士(1996年)
    • 人权法学硕士(香港大学)(2013年)
  • 计算机犯罪调查与计算机取证培训课程结业证书(科技大学)
  • 计算机取证专业文凭(科技大学)

语言

个人资料

Head of Chambers

大卫于1992年在香港获授律师资格,主要专注于民事诉讼业务,涵盖广泛案件类型,包括人身伤害及雇员赔偿(同时代表原告与被告)、婚姻事务、物业转让、买卖双方传票及资产冻结令。 作为辩护律师,他曾参与第14号命令申请、争议性监护权及赡养费诉讼、雇员赔偿审判,并在裁判法院出庭超过50次。.

1995年,戴维加入当时法律部门的检控科担任检察官。在检控科工作的25年间,戴维几乎参与过检控工作的各个方面,在刑事案件的指导和处理方面积累了丰富的经验。他尤其擅长在各级法院进行审判和上诉。 他经手过约30起陪审团审判、大量区域法院及裁判法院案件,并参与处理逾500宗刑事上诉。其中多起案件涉及多名被告及复杂的事实与法律争议。其专业领域涵盖:证券及期货事务监察委员会案件、商业欺诈、网络犯罪、数字证据、人权及宪法辩论、刑事案件上诉、刑期复核及诉讼费用复核。.

戴维于2015年获授御用大律师资格。2017年,他被任命为司法部检察署署长,负责领导该部门,并在此职位上任职至2020年。.

David commenced private practice in 2022.  He continues to conduct trials and appeals and advises defendants and victims of crimes.

大卫连续三年(2023、2024及2025年)获《道尔指南》香港刑事法律大律师榜单评为“推荐资深大律师”。

大卫在香港大学教授刑事诉讼程序与辩护课程多年。他长期担任香港辩护培训委员会"见习辩护人计划"及"检控官即席培训计划"的培训导师,并曾协助在伦敦、文莱、都柏林、斐济及南非等地开展辩护培训课程。.

典型案例

HKSAR v Chu Ka Lok CACC 69/2023 (CA) (Appeal against conviction. Theft. The payment of funds into the defendant’s account for bulk purchases did not automatically give rise to a 奎斯特克洛斯 信任。 普雷迪 所适用的原则——银行转账产生了属于收款人而非付款人的新的债权。

HKSAR v Li Qingbin FACC 7/2024 (CFA) (Statutory interpretation of making a false statement to an immigration officer and using a false travel instrument under the Immigration Ordinance)

HKSAR v Kho Yin Tak HCMA 109/2024 (MA) (Appeal against sentence, conspiracy to defraud, using the ID card of another person to attend an examination, whether a suspended sentence was appropriate)

HKSAR v 曾耀光 CACC 77/2022 (CA) CACC 77/2022 (CA)(针对量刑的上诉,洗钱案,被告在不同银行账户间进行资金分层或转移的行为是否应在量刑时分别计数)

HKSAR v 梁偉堂 HCMA 249/2023 (MA) (Appeal against conviction and sentence, fraud, knowledge of falsity, inference to be drawn from primary evidence)

HKSAR v 葉燿鋒 HCMA 434/2022 (MA) (Appeal against sentence, cruelty to animals, CSO)

HKSAR v 張士宏 HCMA 27/2023 (MA) (Appeal against sentence, failure to pay wages on time, CSO, scope of comments of probation officer in compiling CSO report)

HKSAR v Lung Siu Chuen CACC 279/2021 (CA) (Right to a fair trial, vacant possession)

HKSAR v 黃証鴻 DCCC 188/2022 (District Court sentence) (Unlawful sexual intercourse with a girl under 16, Newton inquiry)

HKSAR v Federal Express Limited HCMA 28/2022 (MA) (The standard and burden of proof of the statutory defence under section 7(3) of the Import and Export Ordinance)

Re Mr David Perry QC HCMP 2221/2020 (CFI) (Ad Hoc Admission)

HKSAR v Ngan Wing Chau [2021] 1 HKLRD 488 (CA) (Murder appeal on the proper direction to the jury on possible alternative defence)

HKSAR v Lui Tsun Sum & others [2021] 4 HKLRD 148, 171 (CA) (The Court summarised the relevant principles regarding 无行为能力)

Secretary for Justice v Leung Kwok Hung [2020] 3 HKLRD 190 (CA) (Scope of the privileges and immunities of the Legco member under BL77 and sections 3 and 4 of the Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance.  Constitutionality of the offence under s 17(c) of the LC(PP)O)

HKSAR v Leung Tin Kei & others [2020] 4 HKLRD 428, 462 (CA) (Whether common purpose is an element of the offence of riot and sentencing principles regarding riot)

HKSAR v Wong Cho Shing & others DCCC 980/2015 (District Court trial), CACC 38/2017 (CA), (2020) 23 HKCFAR 153 (Appeal Committee) (A wounding case committed by 7 police officers, test for admissibility of digital evidence)

HKSAR v Chau Yui Ming (2019) 22 HKCFAR 368 (CFA) (The Court reviewed the legal principles regarding alternative verdicts, particularly those not being lesser offences)

HKSAR v Ng Man Yuen Avery (2019) 22 HKCFAR 241 (Appeal Committee) (The Court reiterated that every party, both defence and prosecution, has the right to be heard)

HKSAR v Cheng Ka Yee & others (2019) 22 HKCFAR 97 (CFA) (Statutory interpretation of the scope of the offence of obtaining access to a computer with a view to dishonest gain under section 161(c) of the Crimes Ordinance)

HKSAR v Tai Yiu Ting & 8 others DCCC 480/2017 (Occupy Central Movement trial in the District Court)

Re Mr Jonathan Caplan QC HCMP 1262/2018 (CFI) (Ad hoc admission)

Secretary for Justice v Wong Chi Fung & others (2018) 21 HKCFAR 35 (CFA) (The Court examined to what extent the Court of Appeal can reverse, modify, substitute or supplement the factual basis of the original sentence in SJ’s application for review of sentence under section 81A of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance)

HKSAR v Wan Thomas & another [2016] 5 HKLRD 656 (CA), (2018) 21 HKCFAR 214 (CFA) (Statutory interpretation of the regime under the Prison Rules on the scope of persons visiting prisoners on remand awaiting trial)

Secretary for Justice v Wong Chi Fung & others [2018] 2 HKLRD 657, 699 (CA) (The Court laid down sentencing principles regarding the offence of unlawful assembly)

HKSAR v 莫嘉濤 & 8 others DCCC 901/2016 (Trial in the District Court of the riot which took place in 2016)

Nguyen Anh Nga v HKSAR (2017) 20 HKCFAR 149 (CFA) (Proper direction on the drawing of inferences)

Jiang Hai Pu v The Department of Justice [2016] 5 HKLRD 184, 197 (CA) (Whether a review of taxation of costs order under section 21 of the Costs in Criminal Cases Ordinance is a final and conclusive judgment)

HKSAR v Lau Shing Chung Simon (2015) 18 HKCFAR 50 (CFA) (Admissibility of records of smartphone text messages – whether it was hearsay or required to be in conformity with section 22A of the Evidence Ordinance)

HKSAR v Koo Sze Yiu & another [2014] 4 HKLRD 565, 582 (MA), (2014) 17 HKCFAR 811 (Appeal Committee) (Whether the offence of desecrating the regional flag, contrary to section 7 of the Regional Flag and Regional Emblem Ordinance, infringes the right to hold opinions without interference under Article 16(1) of the BORO, Article 19 ICCPR and is therefore inconsistent with BL39 and unconstitutional)

Secretary for Justice v Ng Siu Lun CACC 304/2013 (CA) (Proper approach in an application for discharge under s16 of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance)

HKSAR v Li Jialin DCCC 1282/2010 (District Court trial), [2014] 2 HKLRD 538 (CA) (Meaning of “price” for the purpose of the offence of price rigging contrary to section 296(1)(a) of the Securities and Futures Ordinance)

HKSAR v Wong Kwok Wai (2013) 16 HKCFAR 191 (Appeal Committee) (Test for “acting in collusion” with a money lender under section 29(10) of the Money Lenders Ordinance)

HKSAR v Leung Kwok Chi [2013] 3 HKLRD 451 (CA) (SJ’s application for review of sentence for an offence of possession of arms and ammunition without a licence)

HKSAR v Au Yeung Lai Hung Doris [2013] 3 HKLRD 576, 586 (CA) (Meaning of “unnecessary and improper” under section 17 of the Costs in Criminal Cases Ordinance)

HKSAR v Hsu Ming Mei [2013] 1 HKLRD 286 (CA) (Complicated case of theft and access to a computer with dishonest intent to cause loss to another.  Identified an appeal ground/argument not raised by the applicant.  Application of proviso)

HKSAR v Chan Pak Hoe Pablo HCMA 754/2010 (MA), (2012) 15 HKCFAR 244 (CFA) (一宗内幕交易案。对《裁判官条例》第104条的法定解释——在定罪上诉尚未审结的情况下,裁判官能否复核刑罚)

HKSAR v Fu Kor Kuen Patrick & another CACC 179/2010 (CA), (2012) 15 HKCFAR 524 (CFA), led by Mr Kevin Zervos SC (A case of false trading. Statutory interpretation and the burden of proof of the defence under section 295(5) and (7) of the Securities and Futures Ordinance)

HKSAR v Muhammad Riaz Khan CACC 125/2003 (CA), (2012) 15 HKCFAR 232 (CFA), led by Mr Kevin Zervos SC (Test for admissibility of evidence obtained in breach of the defendant’s fundamental rights under the Basic Law or the Bill of Rights)

HKSAR v Chan Kim Chung Nelson [2012] 2 HKLRD 263 (CA) (Principles of sentencing a predicate offence and a connected offence of money laundering)

Secretary for Justice v William Ng Esq. A Coroner [2011] 1 HKLRD 283 (CFI) (Proper approach in an application under section 20 of the Coroners Ordinance for a death inquest to be held)

    • 法学学士(香港大学)(1989年)
    • 法学学士(香港大学)(1990)
    • 香港大学法学硕士(1996年)
    • 人权法学硕士(香港大学)(2013年)
  • 计算机犯罪调查与计算机取证培训课程结业证书(科技大学)
  • 计算机取证专业文凭(科技大学)
  • 香港大学法律学院专业法律教育系名誉讲师(2000–2021)
  • 香港法律改革委员会双重危险小组委员会成员(2006–2011)
  • 司法研究委员会成员(2010–2012)
  • 香港大学法律学院专业法律教育系兼职教授(2015年至2021年)
  • 香港倡导培训委员会执行委员会成员(2023年至今)
  • 《香港注释条例》——《刑事案件訟费条例》,第492章(1997年及2007年修订)
  • 《香港阿奇博尔德法律百科全书》2004年版合著者
  • 香港章节撰稿人,《电子证据:披露、取证与可采性》(第二版,2010年)LexisNexis出版社,Butterworths公司
  • 香港《律师豁免权、职业操守与风险管理》章节撰稿人(2007年)Sweet & Maxwell Asia出版社
  • 香港章节撰稿人,《电子证据:披露、取证与可采性》(第二版,2010年)LexisNexis出版社,Butterworths公司
滚动至顶部